elluminate
Agentic evaluation. Offline scoring, experiment comparison, and quality gates before anything reaches production.
Learn more
We evaluate AI systems, build the data and environments behind them, and bring them into production for health insurance, banking, and public administration.
Made in Germany · working with
Evaluate AI systems before they ship, and test the interfaces they live in.
Agentic evaluation. Offline scoring, experiment comparison, and quality gates before anything reaches production.
Learn more
BITV & BFSG accessibility testing for the interfaces your agents live in.
Learn more
From agentic workflows to EU AI Act compliance: Evaluate, measure, and improve your AI in one place.
A family of small multilingual LLMs for annotating text documents across six categories: core content, classification, quality and value, audience and purpose, safety and compliance, and geographic relevance. These annotations help filter, select, and curate LLM training data at scale. The models outperform much larger general-purpose baselines.
A 24B-parameter LLM for abstractive summarization with inline citations. Every claim is traceable to its source sentence. It supports documents with more than 2M tokens and outperforms all tested open-weight baselines, including models with 3x more parameters.
Curated lm-evaluation-harness task configurations for evaluating English and German base models. Every task is validated against reference models, enabling benchmark suites for early-stage pretraining and in-loop evaluation.
Distributed LLM inference at scale for SLURM clusters. Configure cluster, server, and data settings, then scale across thousands of GPUs with near-linear throughput.
Agents shared passwords, tried public lookups and wrote code to guess missing passwords. An invoice-review test shows what completion reports can leave out.
We measured how many tokens 20 current model tokenizers need for identical text across different languages and text types, including proprietary (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) and open-weight models. Some are great, others will make you pay a token tax. For example, Claude 4.7+ needs twice as many tokens for German as GPT-6 Astra.
Claude Opus 5 performs best overall in the public Terminal-Bench 4 results. GPT-5.6 Sol costs less and matches it on business operations. Their traces show why.
We're hiring people who want to build AI that stands up to reality: regulation, scale, and responsibility. Open positions available across engineering, AI, product, and sales.
See how our products help you evaluate AI systems and test digital accessibility.